Sunday, May 19, 2013

Notes from the Mountains

Please recall an aside from my rant from a few weeks ago:
The next three weeks I will be in the Testing Mountains where I must slay nine giants before descending into the valley where I may frolic among cypresses and libraries and movie nights with friends.

Ten giants, actually. I have returned.

-

Once upon a time, there was a young mage-knight named EAL, who journeyed into the mountains. She carried with her a bottle of water, reams of scratch paper, a TI-84 Plus graphing calculator, pens, and No. 2 pencils. Many of her friends ascended the mountain with her, but they all took slightly different paths.

Our Heroine's trail took her through three finals, two SAT subject tests, and five AP tests. None of these giants were as horrible as she thought they would be, though she confesses to having developed a distinct dislike toward the College Board which doesn't have enough honor to admit to being a profitable organization. Capitalism is good. Lying is not.

But it was not all bad in the mountains. There were concerts, featuring lovely songs:


And there were books to read, including the wonderful amazing book The Chosen, by Chaim Potok (raved about here) and The Joy of Mathematics, by Theoni Pappas, featuring fun problems. Miss Marple (Agatha Christie) was paranoia-inducing and splendid.

Our Heroine did lose at least two nights of sleep worrying about band staff elections, which take place next week, but she is feeling a little better now. Until election day, of course. Eep.

What did Our Heroine learn in her travels through the mountains?

/end third person mode

I have not felt like myself, this past year. Remember how a while back I had all those posts about identity? I don't feel that too much came out of that, because creating an identity is - or so I believe - primarily a subtractive process. Incidentally, we had an FRQ (free response question) about this on the English test:

For centuries, prominent thinkers have pondered the relationship between ownership and the development of self (identity), ultimately asking the question, “What does it mean to own something?”

Plato argues that owning objects is detrimental to a person’s character. Aristotle claims that ownership of tangible goods helps to develop moral character. Twentieth-century philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre proposes that ownership extends beyond objects to include intangible things as well. In Sartre’s view, becoming proficient in some skill and knowing something thoroughly means that we “own” it.

Think about the differing views of ownership. Then write an essay in which you explain your position on the relationship between ownership and sense of self. Use appropriate evidence from your reading, experience, or observations to support your argument.

I realized that my year of being sixteen is soon coming to an end and I don't feel as though I've learned anything about myself. I am no happier, no more tranquil, a little more confident, but still in the process of breaking the smiling mirror. I realized that I have become complacent, despite repeatedly telling myself to fear complacency.

So what do you do?

I thought about the prompt. I thought about Thoreau. I thought - I have way too much stuff. Not just physical stuff, but also too much stuff going on, too many input sources that I feel a need to check up on. During my three weeks away, I logged out of feedly and goodreads and all such things, and I realized that I didn't miss any of the sites that I used to read devotedly. Habit is a snare, and I'd got out of it through luck.

So what do you do?

When I got back yesterday from the mountains, I unfollowed all but a handful of my input sources across all platforms, keeping only those that I actually looked forward to reading, that I saved for last when there were multiple posts aggregated. There were a lot of blogs that I'd followed because I was afraid of missing something, or they'd been really good in the past, or they had pretty pictures. They have now been jettisoned.

A lot of the blogs I had been holding on to for no good reason were ones in which the author of the blog had a definite, concrete personal aesthetic. Even if that aesthetic didn't match mine at all I followed because - because why? I'm not the kind of girl who wears cute vintage frocks. I don't like the pre-Raphaelites very much, either, and I don't wear jewelry, and...

I have a lot of respect for the mythic arts community: Terri Windling, Ellen Kushner, Grace Nuth, &c. But as I said above, I don't particularly like the pre-Raphaelites, nor Victoriana. I have no sympathy for medieval nostalgia, I am pro-STEM, and I am an angry iconoclastic teenager, which explains 80% of everything I do. I unfollowed a lot of people of this ilk, modern-day Romanticists, because without conflict there is no progress and I want to discover what I have to say.

So.

The elves, the ethereal fae, the Green Men, the dreamy-eyed women with long long hair who might have stepped out of trees - all these have left. I have bid them, cordially, goodbye. Theodora Goss is my hero (and I'm still following her blog) but her brand of magical women is not mine. The art that community creates is, I feel, green. Not green as in novice (I am the novice here), but literally, green. Green and silver, probably with red hair.

Justine Musk (whom I am no longer following) says
Every journey starts with the realization that here is a place you can no longer stay.

Also: I think it is about time this blog started living up to its title. Assembling Imaginations.

Here is the game plan:

-expose myself to a lot of different art
-select what resonates (integer harmonics!) and share it here
-in doing so, build who/what I am as a creator, as a reaper and rejoicer

Back to the mountains I go. Care to join me?

Friday, May 17, 2013

Good Hunting

A rather magnificent studio wall, and a wonderfully sparse workspace.

"England Under the White Witch", by Theodora Goss, a lovely short story, and her poem The Fox Wife. Furthermore: be strong.


I haven't read any of Nick Bantock's books, but after watching this video, I sure want to.

Labyrinths in Pagan Sweden, a topic worthy of further investigation.

An article the smartest sophomore I know recommended to me: Is God an Accident? Examines reasons for human belief in divinity and supernatural influences in the world.

Speaking of religion: a website made by some Italian students about le immagini del cosmo. I shall read every word.

Enmi's art is lovely: by trying so hard not to.

Bibliophile Dreamland: reminds me of Komaji the boiler man's place in Spirited Away.

Steamfitter, Lewis Hein
(source)
A whole lot of posts from Enchanted Inkpot:
Mythical Beasts, by R. L. LaFevers. Lots of links.
Music and Magic, by William Alexander
Chinese Dragons, Mermaids, and Unicorns, by Grace Lin. I know very little about Chinese myths, a situation I should rectify.

I tend to do this: find a writing site, blitz through it, and then stop checking. Probably better that way.

Old blog of R. L. LaFevers:
Collaging: sounds like a lot of fun to get immersed in a character's head
Where I Write: a rocking chair to write in sounds wonderful
Micro-Revision checklists: I should keep track of this for when I do third draft of The Utopia Project
Now Make it Worse: make the problem both more difficult and of higher emotional stakes
Some things to consider:

Make your characters suffer. Whoever your hero cannot live without, cannot possibly succeed without, remove them. (Maass suggests killing him, but I write for kids so I take a gentler approach.)

What is your character’s greatest asset? Take it away.

What is sacred to your hero? Undermine it.

How much time does he have? Shorten it.

What matters most to your character? Threaten it.

You get the idea.

From the indomitable Terri Windling: art stands on the shoulders of craft. I love pieces that give me permission to produce terrible writing with the assurance that it's all part of the process (even though I know that I shouldn't *need* permission in the first place).

A collection of animal/insect jewelry.

A new museum in Italy that sounds amazing.

(source - as far back as I could trace it in the jungles of Tumblr)
Rereading sea & salt & submersion, a lovely blog post by Erin Morgenstern (author of The Night Circus) about how she got a new perspective on her WIP.

Article from Outside magazine: How Running Explains the World.

How Graphology Fools People.

Animals:
Affrica's Animals Were Just the Right Size: good to consider for worldbuilding
Siphonophores

Google Products You've Never Heard Of, including Google Art Project, which I resolutely shall not peruse properly until after AP tests. I really do need to keep this in mind, though, because the internet has a whole lot of potential as something to be mined for information.

For further perusal: Anthrocivitas.

(source)
Good weekend.

Friday, May 10, 2013

Ancient Civilizations of Mesopotamia

Basic facts.

Mesopotamia: the land between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers; the Fertile Crescent; the cradle of civilization.

People began to domesticate animals, such as sheep, boats, boars, and aurochs. They then began to plant crops, starting around 7000 BC; sedentary villages emerged. Irrigation allowed for a crop surplus, leading to the emergence of nonagricultural professions.

Sumer: 3500 to 2300 BC. A collection of city-states surrounded by walls to ward off invaders. Three major city-states were Kish, Ur, and Uruk. Religion shaped Sumerian culture; priests were just below kings on the social order, and ziggurats were the center of towns. In Sumer, cuneiform, the world’s first writing system, was invented. Other Sumerian inventions include the wheel, the plot, and a time system based off 60 and factors of 60. Trade routes reached all the way to Egypt. It was during this time that the Epic of Gilgamesh was composed.

Akkadian Empire: Akkad expanded from the Mediterranean Sea to the Persian Gulf. Sargon was the leader of the Akkadian Empire for over 50 years, from 2334 to 2274 BC. According to legend, he was found floating in the basket as a baby and was raised by a gardener. Akkadians created steles.

Babylonian Empire: 1800 to 1600 BC. Hammurabi ruled the Babylonian Empire from 1792 to 1750 BC, during which time he created his famous code of laws that applied to every aspect of Babylonian life and spawned the quote, “an eye for an eye.” Hammurabi’s Code also reveals the social order present in Babylon: patricians were higher than plebeians, who were higher than slaves.

Hittites: Originally from Asia Minor; brief rule in Mesopotamia. They were the first ironworkers and used chariots in battle.

Kassites: Originally from north of Babylon; captured Mesopotamia from the Hittites. They ruled from 1590 to 1200 BC.

Assyrian Empire: Brief rule in the 13th century BC; regained power in 900 BC and collapsed in 612 BC. The Assyrian army was organized and efficient. From the capital, Nineveh, kings ruled over provincial leaders, who collected taxes and enforced laws. Roads and mounted messengers connected the empire. King Ashurbanipal was the last great king of Assyria; his library contained 24,000 cuneiform tablets.

Chaldeans (Neo-Babylonian Empire): 626 to 539 BC. Originally from the Syrian Desert. Nebuchadnezzar, a king of the Chaldeans, created the Hanging Gardens of Babylon for his wife. The Chaldeans borrowed many aspects of Sumerian culture, including language and religion. Study of astronomy culminated in star charts and a calendar.

Friday, May 3, 2013

Poems from Freshman/Sophomore Years

Derivative.

Seven Ways of Looking at Cats

I
In the bright still room
The only movement
Was the twitching tail of a dreaming cat.

II
My mind was focused
Like a cat
Who spies a mouse.

III
Oh great Sphinx of Egypt
Sitting upon your haunches among the sands
How many have disfigured your face?
To how many centuries
Have your sightless eyes borne witness?

IV
At the sight of a cat
Meowing piteously for attention
Even the busiest student
Would set aside her books.

V
It ran over fences
On white paws.
Once, it paused
And a light flashed in its eyes
Making them mirrors.

VI
The birds are panicking.
The cat must be hunting.

VII
It was still night in the morning
No hands moved to open the back door
No outside air stirred in the house
The cat slept curled
On a sun-drowned windowsill.

based on the blackbird poem

--

Ode-Sonnet to Rainy Days

A day of rain is best spent all alone
Sit still and watch the sky go all astir
As clouds do boil just like a soup of stone
Send down the gray to make the windows blur.
It must be beautiful outside, although
In truth, I hardly can see anything;
But I know how the sidewalk rivers flow
And in their wake plastic debris do bring
To pothole seas of which others complain,
Others who’d hastily put up a hood –
Their interest in the weather is long slain –
Wet-socked they question: “How can rain be good?”
Sweet solitude will tell me what to say:
“Does not the storm help dead leaves on their way?”

--

Without Words

I listen to you, because you do not pretend to be Scheherazade:
One thousand and one tales you do not tell.
I have drowned blissfully in the vast sea,
And you never presumed to rescue me.
Suddenly I’ve felt footsteps on my solitude
A heavy, mortal tread,
And how kind you seem out there, waiting
Beyond my locked gate!
Stay that way, guarding against intruders.
And, like the peregrine, find your way here
Only for a short while
Then leave when winter comes.
Be not like the greedy ones who,
Upset, drink my time like water.
When you sit by my empty hearth,
Speak so softly, that as you tell your soul,
The cat on my armchair does not wake.

based on:
“Love without Love”
-Luis Lloréns Torres

I love you, because in my thousand and one nights of dreams,
I never once dreamed of you.
I looked down paths that traveled from afar,
But it was never you I expected.
Suddenly I've felt you flying through my soul
In quick, lofty flight,
And how beautiful you seem way up there, far
From my always idiot heart!
Love me that way, flying over everything.
And, like the bird on its branch, land in my arms
Only to rest,
Then fly off again.
Be not like the romantic one who,
In love, set me on fire.
When you climb up my mansion,
Enter so lightly, that as you enter
The dog of my heart will not bark.

Saturday, April 27, 2013

Prom Issue

I realized a second after I hit "publish" yesterday that I hadn't written about what I was really thinking about yesterday. What has been bothering me was the prom issue of the school magazine, which was distributed yesterday and which rather displeased me.

Disclosure: I am not a card-carrying feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work, that women are underrepresented in various fields and that that is a problem that should be fixed organically (meaning: not affirmative action), and that girls face social pressures that most boys do not. However, political correctness bothers me inherently and I did not expect myself to be so offended by some of the [censored] things said in yesterday's issue.

Clarification: I am not against prom. I think it sounds like a lot of fun and the only reason I didn't go this year was because the tickets were $10 more expensive than my cutoff. What offends me are the attitudes toward/around prom that were put forth in the school newspaper.

Warning: this is going to be shaped distinctly like a rant. I mention fairy tales later.

--

"How to behave like a gentleman and lady": "Your goal is to look as elegant as possible."

I have nothing against elegance; in fact, I like it and I see nothing intrinsically wrong with having it as a goal, as long as you keep in mind that trying to be effortless is an oxymoron of great magnitude. Further, there is indeed a correlation between how you're dressed and how you carry yourself.

However: telling girls that they should focus on how they look instead of how they feel cuts against my notion of progress. What is the purpose of a school dance? To have fun with your friends. I haven't been to a prom (and I'm not going until next year) but extrapolating from my experience at formal, self-consciousness about your appearance is a good way not to have fun.

"When you're talking to your date, don't control the conversation. Allow the other person to do at least half of the talking."

In other words, each of you should talk half the time. Fair enough. But "don't control the conversation" needs to be explained. Don't bring up interesting topics? Why didn't they just write "let the conversation go naturally"? These lines do not so much offend me as bemuse me.

"Hold the door open, stand up when she approaches the table and pull out her chair...Ladies, let the boy do these things for you. It's much more elegant to show you appreciate the effort that to tell him he doesn't need to be courteous."

People should hold doors open for one another in general. As for the rest of it - chivalry is a weird concept. It blends treating people nicely (a good thing) with the assumption that they can't handle it otherwise (a bad thing). Being treated like a glass figurine may well be fun for some girls; however, many of the girls I'm friends with would not, in fact, "appreciate the effort." Does that make us unclassy? So be it.

It seems bizarre, in 2013, that it should be necessary for boys to do everything and for girls to be told not to tell the truth.

-

"Who's got it worse for prom?"

I hope I will not be taken as prejudiced against my own gender when I say that I agreed much more with the argument that boys have it harder, on average. Also, the article arguing that girls have it harder was full of...whining.

"Imagine the feeling a girl gets while waiting around for a prom date, especially if all of her other friends have already been asked. Also, remember that girls cannot make any other plans because they have no idea if anyone is going to ask them or not, and they don't want to seem clingy or aggressive by asking the boy themselves."

Fairy tale thinking is often useful. For example, the next three weeks I will be in the Testing Mountains where I must slay nine giants before descending into the valley where I may frolic among cypresses and libraries and movie nights with friends. (Incidentally, that is why the next three weeks I will not have live posts.)

However, choosing to see yourself as the princess in the tower who needs a knight to come and save her? Not useful. Why on earth should a girl not make plans even before knowing if she's going to have a date? And why shouldn't the girl ask if she likes someone who is available?

That paragraph irked me so much that I am seriously contemplating asking someone to prom next year. No, not a specific someone, but I came up with a Very Cool proposal that involves integrating 1 with respect to y. *

"Girls are attracted to confident boys, so if you act reassured there will be a greater chance of her saying yes. In reality, no girl is mean enough to say no unless she has a boyfriend of a boy she has already made plans with."

Way to generalize. I would be put off by a guy who assumed that I would say yes if we hadn't already discussed plans. Leaving room open for rejection shows greater trust ("I trust you will not laugh at me even if you say no") and respect ("I cannot take you for granted").

Also: girls who reject prom proposals are not "mean". They are being honest with themselves and with the asking boy, which is far more honorable than leading someone on or accepting out of pity. A friend of mine turned down a boy for formal (which I know isn't prom) because she knew he would take it the wrong way if she said yes (i.e. he'd assume that she was open to a relationship with him).

"So get off your lazy bums and ask a beautiful girl to prom."

Let us examine the arguments the writer has made thus far:

0) All girls dream of going to prom.
1) A girl can't go to prom unless she is asked.
2) If she is asked, she must say yes to the first boy who does so.
3) Only beautiful girls are worthy of being asked.

Therefore: only beautiful girls can go to prom, and they will go with the first boy that asks them, potentially leading to a disappointing evening all around.

Fairy tales again: a thief sneaks into a garden in which the statues are women who have been turned to stone. He steals the prettiest one and reanimates her. This ends well for no one.

-the statues left behind are still stone (because of course you can't have fun if you don't go to prom)
-the pretty statue is stuck with a thief (she obviously needed him to reanimate her and she can't help that he was the first one to arrive)
-the thief has to go through all the trouble of reanimation, and he can't be sure that the girl actually wants to be with him because she has to go with the first one to rescue her (since they couldn't discuss anything beforehand)

-

Those two articles were the most cringeworthy in the issue (aside from a bitter anti-prom rant that was simply uncomfortable to read). However, there were other things that bothered me:

1) It's okay not to go to prom because tons of celebrities didn't go to their proms!
2) The perfect girl is demure, blushes at the drop of a hat, likes soppy romantic movies, and does whatever you want.

In other news, the last good humanities teacher I've ever had used to be an amateur calf wrangler.

--

* Explanation:
∫dy = y + c
In other words: yes + si'